Disclaimer
The content is intended for officially approved health care providers.
Please click "I'm a health care provider" to confirm that you are a health care provider.
If you are not a health care provider, please click "Go back home"
I'm a health care provider
Go back home
Nordic Migraine Symposium 2020
Session 1
Future of migraine management
Unmet needs in migraine management
Jan Versijpt,
MD, PhD Neurologist, UZ Brussel, Belgium
Calcitonin family of peptides in migraine - beyond the CGRP
Hashmat Ghanizada,
MD and PhD Fellow, Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet, Glostrup, Denmark
Role of ion channels in the trigeminal system - relation to CGRP signalling
Lars Edvinsson,
MD, DMSci Professor, of Internal Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden, and Copenhagen University, Denmark
Session 2 A
Medication overuse and aCGRP mAbs (Two views)
Please enter the password to see Session 2 A content
Due to difference in Nordic compliance rules, session 2 is not available for Danish viewers
Migraine patients with MO can be treated with aCGRP mAbs without withdrawal
Hans Christopher Diener,
Professor of Neurology and Chairman of the Department of Neurology, University Duisberg-Essen, Germany
Migraine patients with MO can be treated with aCGRP mAbs after withdrawal
Rigmor Højland Jensen,
Dr Med, Professor of Neurology, Director of Danish Headache Center
Session 2 B
Medication overuse headache
New EAN treatment guidelines on medication overuse headache
Signe Bruun Munksgaard,
MD, PhD, Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Denmark
Comparison of three treatment strategies of medication overuse headache - a randomized clinical trial
Louise Ninett Carlsen,
MD, PhD student, Danish Headache Center, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, Denmark
Session 3
Case reports – risk factors for anti-CGRP targeting treatments
Cardiovascular disease
Marja-Liisa Sumelahti,
MD, PhD, Specialist in Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Finland
Comorbidity of migraine and epilepsy: a case report
Annelies Van Dycke,
MD, PhD Neurologist, AZ Sint-Jan, Bruges, Belgium
Pregnancy (and lactation)
Session 4
Migraine in women
Pharmacology of monoclonal antibodies and gepants
Eili Tranheim Kase,
PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Pharmacy, University of Oslo
Migraine management during pregnancy and breastfeeding
Mattias Linde,
MD, PhD, Professor of Neurology, Norwegian Advisory Unit for Headaches and NTNU Consultant Neurologist,
Tjörn Headache Clinic
Session 5
Challenges using aCGRP treatment
Current preventative migraine treatments and the risk of infections
Marja-Liisa Sumelahti,
MD, PhD, Specialist in Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Finland
Follow-up of migraine treatment in the days of pandemic outbreak - is telehealth the answer?
Gürdal Sahin,
MD, PhD, Specialist in Neurology and Head of the Skåneuro Private Headache and Movement Disorders Clinic,
Institution for Clinical Sciences, Lund University
Session 6
Nordic reimbursement guidelines for aCGRP treatment
Sweden
Ingela Nilsson Remahl,
MD, PhD, Head of the Headache Center,
Karolinska University Hospital
In Sweden, all residents have a right to treatment regardless of where they live, their income or their social status but how this obligation is implemented varies between the six health care regions and 21 councils, and also between hospitals. Patients pay the first 2,350 SEK per year of medicines costs, after which they receive full reimbursement. The Swedish Headache Society is currently developing uniform treatment criteria to ensure equal access across Sweden.
Denmark
Lars Bendtsen,
MD, PhD, Associate Professor, Danish Headache
Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet,
Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies are prescribed according to national guidelines developed by the Medicinrådet. Eligible patients have chronic migraine that has not responded to treatment with at least one antihypertensive agent and at least one anti-epileptic drug. Medication overuse must be treated before starting therapy and treatment with onabotulinum toxin A must be stopped. The least expensive anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody is the agent of choice unless there are strong reasons for prescribing an alternative. Patients must be closely followed up and headache days, headache severity and use of acute medications must be documented. Treatment must be reviewed after three months and continued only if moderate/severe headache days have been reduced by ≥30%. Effectiveness and adverse effects should be reviewed every three months. Treatment should be paused after one year to determine whether it is still necessary.
Norway
Lars Jacob Stovner
MD, PhD, Professor of Neurology, Norwegian University
of Science and Technology and Norwegian Advisory Unit
on Headaches, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norwayk
Eligible patients have chronic migraine according to ICHD-3 criteria. The application must document migraine severity (monthly migraine headache days), previous preventive therapy, evidence of medication overuse headache and state that discontinuation of acute treatments has been attempted. Previous treatment with one of at least three pharmacological classes must have been unsuccessful. This may have been due to lack of effectiveness or adverse effects but contraindication is not considered a valid reason for not attempting treatment. For patients who have chronic migraine despite treatment with onabotulinum toxin A and who wish to start with an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody it is recommended that this is done at least 4 months after the last injection, but if an increase in migraine cannot be tolerated, it can also be done immediately. Either way, if CGRP antibodies seem to work, one should try to discontinue onabotulinum toxin A, but in some cases both medicines may be necessary.
The patient must keep a headache diary. Treatment should be reviewed after 3 months and continued only if headache days (severity 2–3 on a scale of 0–4) were reduced by ≥30% during the previous 4 weeks. Clinicians are allowed discretion when interpreting the effectiveness criteria – for example, effectiveness may mean the patient manages with less acute medication, migraine
Finland
Marja-Liisa Sumelahti
MD, PhD, Specialist in Neurology, Faculty of Medicine
and Health Technology, Tampere University, Finland
The statement procedure has two steps. After the first statement, the patient must achieve a ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days over a 12-week period during the first 6 months. The response has to be evaluated at weeks 9-12. The second statement has to be submitted if the response is achieved and then the reimbursement will be continued for a further 2 years. A third statement is then granted if the improvement in monthly migraine days was sustained for the 2-year period. The first two statements must be made by a neurologist but any physician can make the third statement.